16. von Engelhardt LV, Lahner M, Klussmann A. Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11: 75

17. von Engelhardt LV, Raddatz M, Haage P, Bouillon B, David A, Lichtinger TK. Is MRI reliable for diagnostics chondral and osteochondral lesions in patients with acute lateral patella dislocation? BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2010, 11: 149

18. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167: 127–132

19. Mathieu L, Bouchard A, Marchaland JP. Knee MR-arthrography in assessment of meniscal and chondral lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95: 40–47

20. Nikolaou VS, Chronopoulos E, Savvidou C. MRI efficacy in diagnosing internal lesions of the knee: a retrospective analysis. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2008; 2: 4

21. Sonin AH, Pensy RA, Mulligan ME, Hatem S. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression. Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 1159–1166

22. Wong S, Steinbach L, Zhao J, Stehling C, Ma CB, Link TM. Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 38: 761–769

23. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20: 857–864

24. Bachmann GF, Basad E, Rauber K, Damian MS, Rau WS. Degenerative joint disease on MRI and physical activity: a clinical study of the knee joint in 320 patients. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 145–152

25. Blackburn WD Jr, Bernreuter WK, Rominger M Loose LL, Arthroscopic evaluation of knee articular cartilage: a comparison with plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol. 1994; 21: 675–679

26. Broderick LS, Turner DA, Renfrew DL, Schnitzer TJ, Huff JP, Harris C. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. Am J Roentgenol. 1994; 162: 99–103

27. Drapé JL, Pessis E, Auleley GR et al. Quantitative MR imaging evaluation of chondropathy in osteoarthritic knees. Radiology. 1998; 208: 49–55

28. Kawahara Y, Uetani M, Nakahara N. Fast spin-echo MR of the articular cartilage in the osteoarthrotic knee. Correlation of MR and arthroscopic findings. Acta Radiol. 1998; 39: 120–125

29. McNicholas MJ, Brooksbank AJ, Walker CM. Observer agreement analysis of MRI grading of knee osteoarthritis. R Coll Surg Edinb. 1999; 44: 31–33

30. Bachmann G, Heinrichs C, Jürgensen I et al. [Comparison of different MRT techniques in the diagnosis of degenerative cartilage diseases. In vitro study of 50 joint specimens of the knee at T1.5]. Rofo. 1997; 166: 429–436

31. Friemert B, Oberlander Y, Schwarz W. Diagnosis of chondral lesions of the knee joint: can MRI replace arthroscopy? A prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004; 12: 58–64

32. Link TM. MR imaging in osteoarthritis: hardware, coils, and sequences. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009; 47: 617–632

33. Schaefer FK, Kurz B, Schaefer PJ. Accuracy and precision in the detection of articular cartilage lesions using magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla in an in vitro study with orthopedic and histopathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48: 1131–1137

34. Quatman CE, Hettrich CM, Schmitt LC et al. The Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Identification of Early and Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(7): 1557–1568

35. Roemer FW, Eckstein F, Guermazi A. Magnetic resonance imaging-based semiquantitative and quantitative assessment in osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009; 35: 521–555

36. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Woods MA et al. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology. 2010; 255: 117–127

37. Saadat E, Jobke B, Chu B. Diagnostic performance of in vivo 3-T MRI for articular cartilage abnormalities in human osteoarthritic knees using histology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18: 2292–2302

38. Schmitt F, Grosu D, Mohr C et al. [3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths]. Radiologe. 2004; 44: 31–48

39. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 65: 433–441

40. Gold GE, Reeder SB, Yu H. Articular cartilage of the knee: rapid three-dimensional MR imaging at 3.0 T with IDEAL balanced steady-state free precession-initial experience. Radiology. 2006; 240: 546–551

41. Masi JN, Sell CA, Phan C et al. Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. Radiology. 2005; 236: 140–150

42. Schröder RJ, Fischbach F, Unterhauser FN et al. [Value of various MR sequences using 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in analyzing cartilaginous defects of the patella in an animal model]. Rofo. 2004; 176: 1667–1675