Literatur

1. Adelani MA, Keeney JA, Palisch A, Fowler SA, Clohisy JC: Has total hip arthroplasty in patients 30 years or younger improved? A systematic review. Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 2595–601

2. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al.: Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 2003; 73: 115–21

3. Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM: Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 414–20

4. Atrey A, Ward SE, Khoshbin A et al.: Ten-year-follow-up-study of three alternative bearing surfaces used in total hip arthroplasty in young patients; a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2017; 99: 1590–5

5. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP et al.: The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017; 389: 1424–30

6. Bieger R, Ignatius A, Dürselen L, Reichel H: In-vitro Primärstabilitätstestung einer neuen Kurzschaftprothese im Vergleich zum Standardschaft. Jahreskongress der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen, Baden-Baden, 2011

7. Brennan SA, Devitt BM, O’Neill CJ, Nicholson P: Periprosthetic fractures in the resurfaced hip – a case report and review of the literature. Injury 2013; 44: 263–5

8. Brinkmann V, Radetzki F, Delank K, Wohlrab D, Zeh A: A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses. J Orthop and Traumatol 2015; 16: 237–43

9. Buttaro M, Nally F, Diaz F et al.: Which prosthetic system restores hip biomechanics more effectively? Poster at the ICJR World Arthroplasty congress, 16.–18. April 2015, Paris, France

10. Capone A, Bienati F, Torchia S, Podda D, Marongiu G: Short stem total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the fermoral head in patients 60 years or younger: a 3– to 10-year follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 301

11. Cash DJ, Khanduja V: The case for ceramic-on-polyethylen as the preferred bearing for a young adult hip replacement. Hip Int 2014; 24: 421–7

12. Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, Luo ZP: Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24: 945–50

13. Clarke IC, Gustafson A: Clinical and hip simulator comparisons of ceramic-on-polyethylene and metal-on-polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 379: 34–40

14. Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJ, Katz JN: Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 20; 5: e13520

15. Costi K, Solomon LB, McGee MA, Rickman MS, Howie DW: Advantages in using cemented polished tapered stems when performing total hip arthroplasty in very young patients.
J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 1227–33

16. Drosos GI, Touzopoulos P: Short stems in total hip replacement: evidence on primary stability according to the stem type. Hip Int 2019; 29: 118–27

17. Dudkiewicz I, Salai M, Israeli A, Amit Y, Chechick A: Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years of age. Isr Med Assoc J 2003; 5: 709–12

18. Ercan A, Sherif MS, Schmid G, Filler TJ, Abdelkafy A, Jerosch J: Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. SICOT J 2016; 2: 40

19. Ferguson RJ, Broomfield JA, Malak TT et al.: Primary stability of a short bone-conderving femoral stem, a two-year randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 2018; 100: 1148–56

20. Gee MJ, Ajuied A, Shah Z, George M, Bankes MJ: Systematic review of total hip arthroplasty in patients under 30 years old. Hip Int 2013; 23: 345–51

21. Girard J, Glorion C, Bonnomet F, Fron D, Migaud H: Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469: 1141–7

22. Götze C, Ehrenbrink J, Ehrenbrink H: Bleibt der Krafteinfluss der Kurzschaftprothese auf den methaphysären proximalen Femur begrenzt? Osteodensitometrische Analysen der Nanos®-Schaftendoprothese. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148: 398–405

23. Hannouche D, Devriese F, Delambre J et al.: Ceramic-on-ceramic THA implants in patients younger than 20 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474: 520–7

24. Hekmat K, Jacobsson L, Nilsson JA et al.: Decrease in the incidence of total hip arthroplasties in patients with rheumatoid arthritis – results from a well defined populations in south Sweden. Arthritis Res Ther 2011; 13: R67

25. Ikemura S, Yamamoto T, Nakashima Y et al.: Transtrochanteric anterior rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients 20 years or younger. J Pediatr Orthop 2009; 29: 219–23

26. Jäger M, Begg MJ, Ready J et al.: Primary total hip replacement in childhood, adolescence and young patients: quality and outcome of clinical studies. Technol Health Care 2008; 16: 195–214

27. Jerosch J, Wetzel R, Aldinger G et al.: Konstruktionsprinzipien einer individuellen Druckscheibenprothese (I-DSP). Biomedizinische Technik 1999; 44: 64–70