Interessenkonflikt: Keine angegeben

Korrespondenzadresse

Prof. Dr. med. Benjamin Bücking

Zentrum für Orthopädie
und Unfallchirurgie

Universitätsklinikum Gießen
und Marburg GmbH

Standort Marburg

Baldinger Straße

35033 Marburg

buecking@med.uni-marburg.de

Literatur

1. WHO: Problems ISCoDaRH. 10th Revision,Version for 2007, http://apps.who. int/classifications/apps /icd/icd10online/.

2. Pauwels F: Der Schenkelhalsbruch. Ein mechanisches Problem. Stuttgart: F. Enke Verlag, 1935

3. Garden RS: Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg (Br); 1961: 647–663

4. Van Embden D, Rhemrev SJ, Genelin F et al.: The reliability of a simplified Garden classification for intracapsular hip fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012; 98: 405–408

5. van Embden D, Roukema GR, Rhemrev SJ et al.: The Pauwels classification for intracapsular hip fractures: is it reliable? Injury 2011; 42: 1238–1240

6. Müller ME, Koch P, Nazarian S, Schatzker J: The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. New York: Springer, 1990

7. Buord JM, Flecher X, Parratte S et al. Garden I femoral neck fractures in patients 65 years old and older: is conservative functional treatment a viable option? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96: 228–234

8. Andrew TA, Thorogood M: Subtrochanteric fracture after Garden screw fixation: a review of predisposing factors and management in nine cases. Injury 1984; 16: 169–177

9. Howard CB, Davies RM: Subtrochanteric fracture after Garden screw fixation of subcapital fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64: 565–567

10. Yih-Shiunn L, Chien-Rae H, Wen-Yun L: Surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthop 2007; 31: 677–682

11. Gjertsen JE, Fevang JM, Matre K et al.: Clinical outcome after undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop 2011; 82: 268–274

12. AQUA Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen: Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2011. 17/1, Hüftgelenksnahe Femurfraktur. Qualitätsindikatoren. Erstellt am 31.05.2012, www.aqua-institut.de. In

13. Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B et al.: Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 15–25

14. Gao H, Liu Z, Xing D et al.: Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly?: A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1782–1791

15. Rogmark C, Leonardsson O, Garellick G et al.: Monoblock hemiarthroplasties for femoral neck fractures – a part of orthopaedic history? Analysis of national registration of hemiarthroplasties 2005–2009. Injury 2012; 43: 946–949

16. Burgers PT, Van Geene AR, Van den Bekerom MP et al.: Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 1549–1560

17. Yu L, Wang Y, Chen J: Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 2235–2243

18. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S: Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD001706

19. Li T, Zhuang Q, Weng X et al.: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e68903

20. Langslet E, Frihagen F, Opland V et al.: Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 1291–1299

21. Arzneimittelkommission. der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Kardiopulmonale Zwischenfälle bei der Verwendung von Knochenzement (UAW – Aus Fehlern lernen) www.akdae.de/Arzneimittelsicherheit/Bekanntgaben/Archiv/2008/20081 212.html, Download 12.12.2014.

22. Bonnaire F, Lein T, Bula P: [Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants]. Unfallchirurg 2011; 114: 491–500

23. Parker MJ, Handoll HH: Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD000093

24. Bhandari M, Schemitsch E, Jönsson A et al.: Gamma nails revisited: gamma nails versus compression hip screws in the management of intertrochanteric fractures of the hip: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23: 460–464

25. Matre K, Havelin LI, Gjertsen JE et al.: Intramedullary nails result in more reoperations than sliding hip screws in two-part intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 1379–1386

26. Werner-Tutschku W, Lajtai G, Schmiedhuber G et al.: [Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN]. Unfallchirurg 2002; 105: 881–885

27. Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C et al.: Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 2347–2354

28. Müller T, Topp T, Kühne CA et al.: The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1237–1243

29. Rubio-Avila J, Madden K, Simunovic N et al.: Tip to apex distance in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18: 592–598