21. Miska et al. Reconstruction of a large osteochondral lesion of the distal tibia with an iliac crest graft and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC): a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg 2012; 51: 680–683

22. Benthien JP, Behrens P. The treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC): method description and recent developments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 1316–1319

23. Kusano T et al. Treatment of isolated chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee by autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA 2011; pp.

24. Eshed I, Trattnig S, Sharon M et al. Assessment of cartilage repair after chondrocyte transplantation with a fibrin-hyaluronan matrix--correlation of morphological MRI, biochemical T2 mapping and clinical outcome. European Journal of Radiology 2012; 81: 1216–1223

25. Imhoff AB et al. Osteochondral transplantation of the talus: long-term clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. The American journal of sports medicine 2011; 39: 1487–1493

26. Valderrabano V et al. Knee-to-ankle mosaicplasty for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle joint. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: Suppl 1: 105S–111S

27. Petersen L et al. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the ankle. Foot Ankle Clin 2003; 8: 291–303

28. Whittaker et al. Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005; 87: 179–183

29. Behrens P, Ehlers EM, Köchermann KU et al. Neues Therapieverfahren für lokalisierte Knorpeldefekte. Ermutigende Resultate mit der autologen Chondrozytenimplantation. MMW Fortschr Med 1999; 141: 49–51

30. Anderer U, Libera J. In vitro engineering of human autogenous cartilage. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 1420–1429

31. Bartlett W, Skinner JA, Gooding CR. Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 2005; 87: 640–645.

32. Basad E, Ishaque B, Bachmann G, Stürz H, Steinmeyer J. Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2-year randomised study. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy : Official Journal of the ESSKA 2010; 18: 519–527

33. Anders S et al. Treatment of deep articular talus lesions by matrix associated autologous chondrocyte implantation – results at five years. International orthopaedics 2012; 36: 2279–2285

34. Lee DH, Lee KB, Jung ST, Seon JK, Kim MS, Sung IH. Comparison of early versus delayed weightbearing outcomes after microfracture for small to midsized osteochondral lesions of the talus. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2012; 40: 2023–2028

35. Stöckle U, König B, Tempka A, Südkamp NP. [Cast immobilization versus vacuum stabilizing system. Early functional results after osteosynthesis of ankle joint fractures]. Der Unfallchirurg 2000; 103: 215–219

36. van Bergen CJA et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral defects of the talus: outcomes at eight to twenty years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 519–25

37. van Dijk CN, Reilingh ML, Zengerink M, van Bergen CJA. Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful? Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 2010; 18: 570–580

38. Gomoll AH et al. The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18: 434–447

39. Madry H et al. The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18: 419–433

40. Deol PPS, Cuttica DJ, Smith WB, Berlet GC. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: size, age, and predictors of outcomes. Foot and Ankle Clinics 2013; 18: 13–34

41. Aurich M et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. The American journal of sports medicine 2011; 39: 311–319

42. Domayer SE et al. Cartilage repair of the ankle: first results of T2 mapping at 7.0 T after microfracture and matrix associated autologous cartilage transplantation. Osteoarthr Cartil 2012; 20: 829–836

43. Zengerink M, Struijs PAA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy : Official Journal of the ESSKA 2010; 18, 238–246

44. ValderrabanoV et al. Reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus with autologous spongiosa grafts and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2013; 41: 519–527

Fussnoten

1 ATOS-Klinik Heidelberg – Zentrum für Hüft- und Knie-Endoprothetik, Regenerative Gelenkchirurgie