21. Huber M, Stutz PM, Gerber C: Open reduction and internal fixation of the posterior malleolus with a posterior antiglide plate using a postero-lateral approach – a preliminary report. Foot Ankle Surg 1996; 2: 95–103

22. Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T et al.: A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury 2015; 46: 1119–26

23. Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bédard L et al.: A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture.
J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29: 216–23

24. Lash N, Horne G, Fielden J et al.: Ankle fractures: functional and lifestyle outcomes at 2 years. ANZ J Surg 2002, 72: 724–30

25. Lee KM, Ahmed S, Park MS et al.: Effectiveness of arthroscopically assisted surgery for ankle fractures: A meta-analysis. Injury 2017; 48: 2318–22

26. Leontaritis N, Hinojosa L, Panchbhavi VK: Arthroscopically detected intra-articular lesions associated with acute ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 333–9

27. Leumann A, Valderrabano V, Plaass C et al.: A novel imaging method for osteochondral lesions of the talus-comparison of SPECT-CT with MRI. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2011; 39: 1095–101

28. Li M, Collier RC, Hill BW et al.: Comparing different surgical techniques for addressing the posterior malleolus in supination external rotation ankle fractures and the need for syndesmotic screw fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017; 56: 730–4

29. Little MM, Berkes MB, Schottel PC et al.: Anatomic fixation of supination external rotation type IV equivalent ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29: 250–5

30. Loren GJ, Ferkel RD: Arthroscopic assessment of occult intra-articular injury in acute ankle fractures. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 412–21

31. Miller MA, Mcdonald TC, Graves ML et al.: Stability of the syndesmosis after posterior malleolar fracture fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2018; 39: 99–104

32. Mintz DN, Tashjian GS, Connell DA et al.: Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a new magnetic resonance grading system with arthroscopic correlation. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 353–9

33. Nelson MC, Jensen NK: The treatment of trimalleolar fractures of the ankle. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1940; 7: 509–14

34. O'Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG: Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2010; 38: 392–404

35. Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Phan K et al.: Suture button versus syndesmosis screw constructs for acute ankle diastasis injuries: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Foot Ankle Surg 2018; DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.008

36. O'Connor TJ, Mueller B, Ly TV et al.: “A to p” screw versus posterolateral plate for posterior malleolus fixation in trimalleolar ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29: e151–6

37. Ray R, Koohnejad N, Clement ND et al.: Ankle fractures with syndesmotic stabilisation are associated with a high rate of secondary osteoarthritis. DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2017.10.005

38. Shi H-F, Xiong J, Chen Y-X et al.: Comparison of the direct and indirect reduction techniques during the surgical management of posterior malleolar fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18: 109

39. Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Myerson CL et al.: Suture button versus syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injuries: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2018; 26: 363546518804804

40. Soohoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ et al.: Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1042–9

41. Stavem K, Naumann MG, Sigurdsen U et al.: The association of body mass index with complications and functional outcomes after surgery for closed ankle fractures. The bone & joint journal 2017; 99-B: 1389–98

42. Stufkens SA, Knupp M, Horisberger M et al.: Cartilage lesions and the development of osteoarthritis after internal fixation of ankle fractures:
a prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010: 92: 279–86

43. Takao M, Uchio Y, Naito K et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of combined intra-articular disorders in acute distal fibular fractures. J Trauma 2004; 57: 1303–7

44. Tejwani NC, Pahk B, Egol KA: Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on outcome after unstable ankle fracture. J Trauma 2010; 69: 666–9

45. Thordarson DB, Bains R, Shepherd LE: The role of ankle arthroscopy on the surgical management of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 22: 123–5

46. Tosun B, Selek O, Gok U, Ceylan H: Posterior malleolus fractures in trimalleolar ankle fractures: Malleolus versus transyndesmal fixation. Indian journal of orthopaedics 2018; 52: 309–14

47. Turhan E, Doral MN, Demirel M et al.: Arthroscopy-assisted reduction versus open reduction in the fixation of medial malleolar fractures. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 2013; 23: 953–9

48. Van Vlijmen N, Denk K, Van Kampen A et al.: Long-term results after ankle syndesmosis injuries. Orthopedics 2015; 38: e1001–6

49. Velleman J, Nijs S, Hoekstra H: Operative management of AO type 44 ankle fractures: determinants of outcome. J Foot Ankle Surg 2018; 57: 247–53